Expert Addressed Limits of Skin Color Classification

The Fitzpatrick system may overlook biological factors that determine how skin responds to cosmetic laser treatments.

Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Beauty

Gouache-painted illustration showing a collection of organic, textured color patches in a neutral palette, representing biological skin diversity.
Dermatologists are moving toward personalized biological assessments for cosmetic laser treatments to improve clinical precision across diverse patient populations. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you trust medical treatments more when they are tailored to your specific biological profile?

At the 2026 Skin of Color Update conference in New York, dermatologist Eliot F. Battle highlighted how reliance on Fitzpatrick skin types can lead to incomplete clinical assessments. This discussion affects how patients across the country understand the limitations of standardized laser settings for diverse skin tones.

Why it matters

Standard laser parameters are often calibrated based on generalized skin color profiles rather than individual biology. This approach can fail to account for essential factors like age, genetics, and inflammation that influence how skin reacts to energy-based procedures.

Clinical reviews indicate that the majority of participants in dermatological research fall into Fitzpatrick skin types 1 through 3. This narrow focus limits the depth of data available for higher-numbered skin types, such as type 4, when determining effective and safe energy-based treatment protocols.

The players

Eliot F. Battle

A dermatologist and cofounder and CEO of Cultura Dermatology & Laser Center in Washington, DC.

The details

Clinicians traditionally select laser parameters by choosing from manufacturer presets based on Fitzpatrick skin type classifications. These settings rely on broad color-based profiles that ignore individual biological variables. Advanced approaches are moving toward using artificial intelligence to synthesize a patient's unique biological data—such as genetics and inflammatory history—to inform more precise treatment settings.

Timeline

  1. The Skin of Color Update conference occurred in 2026.

Health Landscape

The dermatological field is shifting from rigid, color-based classification systems toward more nuanced, biology-first models of care. This evolution follows a concerted effort by the medical community to address the underrepresentation of diverse skin types in clinical research.

When considering energy-based cosmetic procedures, it is worth discussing your specific skin history and goals with a board-certified dermatologist. Ask how your practitioner adjusts device settings based on your unique profile beyond simple color-based classifications.

The takeaway

Reliable treatment outcomes often depend on a physician's ability to account for individual biology rather than generalized color classifications. Always verify that your provider has experience tailoring laser settings to your specific skin type and health background.

Further reading

For more on evolving standards for inclusive skin treatments, visit Beauty.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Ajmc.

Live Poll

Do you trust medical treatments more when they are tailored to your specific biological profile?