PFAS Treatment Options Evaluated for Landfill Liquids

A new industry analysis provides landfill operators with data on the effectiveness of 15 technologies to remove harmful compounds.

Updated on Oct. 5, 2026 in Organic Food

Isometric editorial illustration of a modular industrial water filtration manifold, representing technical solutions for landfill liquid management.
The Environmental Research and Education Foundation has released an analysis of 15 technologies to help landfill operators manage PFAS contaminants in leachate. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should landfill operators prioritize cheaper treatment options despite lower efficiency in removing water contaminants?

The Environmental Research and Education Foundation has identified 15 PFAS treatment technologies for landfill liquids, noting that leachate concentrations often exceed those in other water sources. The findings aim to help operators select site-specific solutions for these persistent chemicals.

Why it matters

Understanding which technologies work best is critical for landfill operators, as site-specific variability makes a universal treatment approach impossible. Selecting the right technology helps ensure effective containment of these compounds in the environment.

The analysis evaluated 15 technologies across 590 landfill sites, 812 groundwater locations, and 410 surface water locations. Foam fractionation achieved removal rates between 60 and 99 percent in the findings.

The players

Environmental Research and Education Foundation

An organization dedicated to research and education regarding sustainable solid waste management practices.

Suzy Boxman

A researcher who presented the foundation's latest assessment on landfill water treatment.

The details

The analysis focuses on managing short-chain PFAS compounds, which are commonly found in landfill leachate. Two primary technologies, foam fractionation and reverse osmosis, were highlighted for their suitability, though each requires specific management strategies for concentrated residuals. These residuals often necessitate further handling through methods such as solidification, encapsulation, deep-well injection, or incineration.

Timeline

  1. Suzy Boxman presented the analysis findings at RCon 2026.

Health Landscape

This analysis builds on the ongoing EREF PFAS research initiative to address the widespread presence of these persistent chemicals. It provides a necessary bridge between academic study and the operational challenges currently facing waste management facilities.

This research primarily serves as a guide for facility operators to reduce the environmental spread of PFAS through better containment. If you are concerned about water quality in your area, consider contacting your local water utility to ask about their testing and treatment protocols for these compounds.

The takeaway

Selecting appropriate treatment technology is essential for managing chemical residuals effectively at landfill sites. Stay informed about local environmental health reports to understand how your community addresses potential contamination risks.

Further reading

For broader context on minimizing environmental chemical exposure, visit the Organic Food section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Waste360.

Live Poll

Should landfill operators prioritize cheaper treatment options despite lower efficiency in removing water contaminants?