Former Rare Beauty Employee Files Federal Lawsuit

A former staffer alleges she faced retaliation and constructive discharge after taking protected family leave.

Updated on Oct. 22, 2026 in Beauty

Bold flat-color editorial illustration showing stark, overlapping geometric building silhouettes, representing the imposing nature of corporate legal institutions.
A former Rare Beauty employee has filed a federal lawsuit against the company and AllWork Inc., alleging retaliation after taking family leave. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

A former employee has filed a federal lawsuit against Rare Beauty LLC and AllWork Inc., alleging workplace retaliation and constructive discharge. The complaint centers on claims that the plaintiff faced reduced work hours and exclusion from team communications after taking protected leave.

Why it matters

This case highlights the legal protections surrounding workers who take authorized leave to care for family members. It underscores the challenges employees may face when attempting to balance caregiving duties with their professional responsibilities.

A legal complaint was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, initiating a case regarding employment practices. The validity of these allegations remains unproven as legal proceedings are in their early stages.

The players

Katia Etienne

A former employee of Rare Beauty who has initiated legal action against her former employers regarding workplace rights.

Rare Beauty LLC

A cosmetics brand founded by Selena Gomez that is named as a defendant in a recent federal disability bias and retaliation lawsuit.

AllWork Inc.

A staffing or employment services organization named as a co-defendant in the legal action brought by the former employee.

The details

The plaintiff, Katia Etienne, alleges that she was systematically excluded from necessary trainings and team-wide communications during her tenure. She claims that these actions, combined with a reduction in her scheduled work hours, created an intolerable environment that led to constructive discharge. These measures were allegedly taken in direct retaliation for her use of protected leave to care for her mother.

Timeline

  1. The plaintiff alleges that constructive discharge occurred in 2025.

  2. The legal complaint was filed in federal court on October 21, 2026.

Health Landscape

This litigation occurs within the framework of the Family and Medical Leave Act, which governs the rights of employees to care for family members. The case underscores ongoing tensions regarding workplace accommodation and the protection of workers who utilize mandated leave.

This development serves as a reminder to keep documentation of employment interactions and any requests for protected leave. If you are experiencing difficulties maintaining your workplace rights while managing caregiving responsibilities, consider consulting with a labor law expert.

The takeaway

Workers should remain aware of their rights when requesting protected leave for family care. Maintain clear communication with human resources and document any changes to your professional standing that coincide with your leave status.

Further reading

For broader trends in wellness and workplace culture, visit our Beauty section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.