ACLU Challenged Pre-Employment Bias in California

The civil rights group seeks a probe into whether job screening tools unfairly screen out neurodivergent candidates.

Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Autism

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of metallic barriers in navy and cream, symbolizing the institutional hurdles faced by job applicants. — The ACLU filed a formal complaint with California regulators requesting an investigation into Criteria Corp.'s Emotify hiring software over potential neurodivergent bias. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe employers should be restricted from using automated emotional intelligence tests during hiring?

The ACLU has filed a formal complaint with the California Civil Rights Department requesting an investigation into the Criteria Corp. Emotify assessment product. The group alleges the tool functions as an unauthorized pre-employment clinical assessment for neurodevelopmental conditions like autism.

Why it matters

California law prohibits the use of clinical assessments before a job offer is extended to ensure fair hiring practices. This complaint highlights growing concerns that standardized hiring software may inadvertently discriminate against applicants based on disability, race, and sex.

The ACLU complaint cites concerns that the Emotify tool replicates clinical metrics for autism and neurodevelopmental conditions. It remains unknown how the developer intends to address these allegations or if current internal validation protocols will be made public.

The players

ACLU

A national civil liberties organization that advocates for the rights of individuals, including those with disabilities.

California Civil Rights Department

The state agency responsible for enforcing civil rights laws and protecting residents from discrimination in the workplace.

Criteria Corp.

A developer of employment testing and assessment software, including the Emotify cognitive and behavioral tool.

The details

The product in question, Emotify, utilizes cognitive and behavioral testing tasks often found in neurodevelopmental screenings. By incorporating these elements into the hiring process, the ACLU argues the software essentially performs unauthorized medical examinations on job applicants. State regulations are designed to prevent such screening from influencing hiring decisions before a conditional offer is made.

October 6, 2026: The ACLU filed the formal complaint with the California Civil Rights Department.

Health Landscape

This action sits at the intersection of evolving workplace disability protections and the rapid adoption of AI-driven hiring software. It follows established precedents for testing the limits of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act regarding discriminatory hiring technology.

Applicants who encounter mandatory behavioral assessments during the hiring process may wish to document their experiences if they suspect the tool evaluates neurodevelopmental markers. Concerns about potential discrimination in job screenings are worth discussing with your doctor or a legal advocate.

The takeaway

The use of clinical-style assessments in hiring remains a sensitive area of labor law that impact candidates with neurodevelopmental differences. Candidates should remain informed about their rights under state employment law and consult with professionals if they feel their disability status influenced hiring outcomes.