Greenpeace Linked Agricultural Firms to Indonesian Fires
Agricultural land concessions in Indonesia showed evidence of fires in recent months, impacting international supply chains.
Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Organic Food
Live Poll
Should agricultural companies be held accountable for environmental damage occurring on their land?
In recent months, Greenpeace and the Indonesian organization Pantau Gambut identified over 20 palm, pulp, and sugar companies with active fire sources on their land concessions in Indonesia. These firms include several businesses with links to Malaysia and Singapore.
Why it matters
These findings highlight environmental concerns within agricultural supply chains that may eventually affect the sourcing of commodities. Understanding these production links is essential for consumers who prioritize sustainable practices when selecting food and household goods.
A collaborative investigation by Greenpeace and the NGO Pantau Gambut identified fire sources on the concessions of more than 20 agricultural firms. The report tracked active fires within these land parcels over recent months in Indonesia.
The players
Greenpeace
An international environmental organization known for investigating corporate impacts on global ecosystems and advocating for sustainable supply chain practices.
Pantau Gambut
An Indonesian non-governmental organization that monitors peatland management and industrial land use patterns.
The details
The fires occurred on land managed by palm, pulp, and sugar agricultural companies. By monitoring land concessions in Indonesia, researchers were able to pinpoint fire activity associated with these specific corporate entities. These land management practices often rely on clearing methods that, when uncontrolled, lead to widespread burning across the region.
Timeline
Fires ravaged land in Indonesia throughout recent months.
Health Landscape
The identification of these fire sources underscores persistent challenges in enforcing the environmental standards set by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. It reflects an ongoing trend where independent monitoring challenges the transparency of international agricultural supply chains.
Consumers concerned about the sustainability of their pantry staples may want to look for certifications that verify responsible land use. Discussing sourcing transparency with your preferred brands can help you make informed decisions about the products you bring into your home.
The takeaway
This report serves as a reminder that environmental land management in distant regions can correlate with the companies supplying global markets. Readers can prioritize transparency by researching the environmental policies of the companies behind the products they regularly purchase.
Further reading
Learn more about the implications of industrial farming on sustainability in our Organic Food section.
Live Poll
Should agricultural companies be held accountable for environmental damage occurring on their land?
