Healthcare Professionals Favored Breastfeeding in New Study

Researchers explored how automatic and conscious attitudes toward infant feeding compare among providers.

Updated on Oct. 5, 2026 in Nutrition

Bold vector editorial illustration showing a wooden baby bottle and a geometric form, representing unconscious bias in medical infant feeding advice.
A recent study from Atlantic Technological University suggests that while healthcare professionals consciously support breastfeeding, automatic biases may still influence infant feeding care. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you trust that healthcare providers offer unbiased infant-feeding support regardless of their personal beliefs?

A recent study from Atlantic Technological University found that healthcare professionals generally hold positive attitudes toward breastfeeding. The researchers compared these views against automatic associations to understand how unconscious bias might influence care.

Why it matters

Understanding the divide between stated beliefs and automatic associations is critical, as unconscious biases in medical staff may influence the quality of support offered to new parents regarding infant feeding decisions.

This study utilized the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale to gauge conscious views and the Infant Feeding Implicit Association Test to measure automatic responses. While findings showed a general preference for breastfeeding, no statistically significant relationship existed between the two measures.

The players

Atlantic Technological University

A higher education institution based in Donegal, Ireland, that conducts research across various health and scientific disciplines.

The details

The Infant Feeding Implicit Association Test measures automatic attitudes by tracking how quickly participants pair images of different feeding methods with positive or negative concepts. This is contrasted with the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale, which uses a questionnaire to capture what a participant consciously reports. By analyzing these two distinct psychological layers, researchers seek to identify whether ingrained, unconscious beliefs about infant nutrition potentially conflict with a practitioner's stated clinical advice.

Timeline

  1. October 5, 2026: Article publication date.

Health Landscape

This research builds on the use of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale to quantify provider sentiment regarding pediatric nutrition. It marks a departure from traditional surveys by incorporating implicit association testing to explore the role of psychological bias in clinical support.

When discussing feeding plans with a pediatrician or midwife, you may wish to ask about their practice's current evidence-based support policies. Open conversations about your personal feeding goals are always a worthwhile way to ensure your care team remains aligned with your preferences.

The takeaway

Clinicians may harbor automatic attitudes that differ from their consciously expressed views, which is an important consideration for patient-provider communication. If you feel your feeding preferences are not being heard, consider explicitly stating your goals to your healthcare team during your next visit.

Further reading

For more research on infant feeding guidance, visit our Nutrition section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Atlantic Technological University.

Live Poll

Do you trust that healthcare providers offer unbiased infant-feeding support regardless of their personal beliefs?